-
Case正在进行中
通过社交媒体评估者分享
一个期刊操作双盲同行评审，因此审阅者不知道作者的身份，反之亦然。但是，由于审阅者可能会发现作者的身份（因为研究，参考，写作风格等），因此不保证作者的匿名性。但是，作者可以识别审核人员。期刊收到了一个... -
Case正在进行中
方法论的再现性
哨子鼓风机联系了关于两个公布的文章的Journal A.文章重点关注能量愈合对体外疾病模型的影响。吹口哨鼓风机提高了对所用能量愈合方法的适当性和再现性的担忧。联系了作者以提供对方法的解释，因为缺乏清晰度...... -
Case案件已关闭
对拒绝评论和公布更正的同行评审产生的争议
在2016年，我们在我们的期刊中分组出版的稿件X.2017年初，B组提交了对已发布的稿件批评的评论。在同行评审后，按照日记的那些活动政策，评论被驳回了进一步的考虑。该政策允许原始文章的作者成为评论的同行评审员之一。潜在的作者...... -
Case案件已关闭
Reviewer requesting addition of multiple citations of their own work
A handling editor noticed a reviewer report where the reviewer instructed the author to cite multiple publications by the same reviewer in their manuscript. The handling editor noted a similar instance involving this reviewer from the past and requested the editorial office to look into his reviewing history. This uncovered a concerning pattern of behaviour where the reviewer habitually asked a… -
Case案件已关闭
Peer reviewer contacted by author
在一个盲目同行评审过程中，审稿人提交了关于改进统计分析的详细建议。提交人被要求修改并重新提交本文以解决这些和其他审稿人的建议。提交人，不知道审稿人的身份，随后将审计员视为专业会议的尊重同事，以讨论Manuscr ...... -
Case案件已关闭
编辑和审查ers requiring authors to cite their own work
我们的编辑部工作人员注意到一个决定信，即处理编辑指示提交人引用处理编辑发布的文章。工作人员想知道这是否发生了此前并通过该编辑审查了最近的决策信件。这揭示了一个关于行为模式 - 处理编辑的决定信（包括审阅者的评论）问Au ... -
Case案件已关闭
研究论文的主要作者不同意的内容
接受的研究论文的作者（表现出有争议的待遇的一些好处）在发布本文之前很快就联系了该期刊。我们的期刊政策是提前与作者分享的委托社论。但是，本作者收到了期刊新闻稿的副本，以准备新闻发布会。新闻稿引用了sta ... -
Case正在进行中
Editor found guilty of research misconduct
A journal appointed a new editor-in-chief to their journal. He had previously been on the editorial board of the journal for 10 years and the editorial registrar for 5 years. During the handover period, it came to the journal’s attention that he was due to appear in front of a tribunal for research fraud. By agreement with the journal, he stepped down until the outcome of the tribunal, and the… -
Case案件已关闭
是否抄袭从手稿审查中使用文本逐字？
杂志A并拒绝评论。然后，本文在B杂志上提交并接受。B. B期刊B发表了评论。出版后，来自A杂志的审查员写信给B杂志的诉讼。他/她的评论中的文本用于COPE论坛期刊B Questifik（S）的评论中使用•JO的编辑应该如何... -
Case案件已关闭
作者请求公布审查评论的许可
An author submitted a Forum manuscript critiquing an article published in the journal six years previously. The Forum manuscript was reviewed by three reviewers who all recommended rejection, and was evaluated by an associate editor and a senior editor, who rejected the manuscript on the grounds that the reviewers were unconvinced by the critique and felt that it did not really advance the subj… -
Case案件已关闭
被拒绝的论文的作者公开姓名并批评同行评审员
The first author of a paper rejected by our journal publicly identified one of the four peer reviewers for the paper by name. She did this during a media interview conducted after the paper was published by another journal. The first author implied in that interview and subsequently on Twitter that the paper was rejected because of that person's review and also claimed the reviewer did not reve… -
Case案件已关闭
作者要求某些专家不包括在编辑过程中
一位潜在作者联系了医学日刊的编辑部，要求未经涉及关于本文主题的一些公布指南的专家审查或谘询预期提交。bob官方app作者名称为其中一些专家，其中包括杂志的成员（包括编辑A）。作者通过解释了这个要求 -
Case案件已关闭
审查人员对同行评审过程的透明度担忧
我们的期刊在内部透明的过程中使用了整个编辑或同行评审过程，作者，编辑和审核人员都知道涉及谁的身份。审核人员也被告知 - 当最初征求待办事项审查时 - 他们将以最终文章稿件命名为审阅者。在发布之前，将发送文本的预先打印版本以查看... -
Case案件已关闭
Reviewer requests to be added as an author after publication
一篇论文提交给我们的杂志。分配给论文的副编辑立即为一名评论员分配了他所知道的审核人员，这些审查员有资格给予良好的评论，因为他们以前与作者合作过。鉴于密切合作，编辑们认为奇怪的是审稿人不是这份特定论文的作者。但是，当邀请时，审稿人（R1），没有标记任何Con ... -
Case案件已关闭
Possible breach of reviewer confidentiality
Soon after rejecting a paper—after it underwent peer review but before discussion at the manuscript meeting—the author wrote to tell me that he was asked questions “about the manuscript” at a presentation at a national meeting. The author stated: “A member of the audience addressed questions to me from a copy of the manuscript, and not from the talk I gave. I had to ask him to say nothing furth… -
Case案件已关闭
Online posting of confidential draft by peer reviewer
Shortly before publication, I received an email from the authors of a systematic review telling me that a version of the paper as first submitted to the journal for peer review had appeared on the website of a campaign group based in the USA. It was clear that the version of the document posted on the website was the same as the version supplied to the journal's peer reviewers. Further investig… -
Case正在进行中
Two reviewer reports contain a significant amount of verbatim textual overlap
期刊主编收到的四个审查员报告中有两份录制数量的逐字文本重叠。虽然同样的本地（非英语）语言，但两位审稿人都隶属于不同国家的机构。报告在彼此的5天内提交给期刊。这两个审稿人都建议拒绝提交。separa ... -
Case案件已关闭
Ethical obligation to find reviewers
An associate editor handling a paper for this journal reported to the editor-in-chief that he had not yet been able to recruit a single reviewer—all those who have been contacted had declined or not responded. The paper is in scope for the journal, it seems of reasonably quality from a brief read and the associate editor is appropriate; but this is a small and specialised field, and finding exp… -
Case案件已关闭
有关敏感主题的部门通知
An essay was submitted to a specialty medical journal. In the essay, the author described an ethical dilemma—involving patient care—encountered while in medical school. The manuscript received favourable reviews, although the reviewers expressed concern about the author’s career if the essay was published. The editor called the author to discuss the ramifications of publication, and then the au…