你在这里

Intellectual property

应清楚地描述所有关于知识产权的政策,包括版权和发布许可证。此外,与发布相关的任何成本都应该对作者和读者显而易见。应清除政策,以妨碍考虑的预算。应指定抄袭和冗余/重叠出版物的是什么

Our core practices

核心实践是政策和实践期刊和出版商需要,以达到出版伦理的最高标准。我们包括案件,咨询,日常练习的指导,教育模块和关于题单问题的事件,支持期刊和出版商履行其政策。
案件

抄袭案例

07-11

A letter was sent to the editor indicating that three articles (one of them in the editor’s journal) on identical subjects had been published in the same year (2006) by the same authors, accusing the first author of all three articles of stealing data from and plagiarising a previously published article from the academic institution where the first author previously worked.

案件

抄袭的定义?

07-05

1997年,一本书(在意大利语中)在意大利作曲家的生活中发表,通过分析他的木乃伊遗体来组装。作者A关于人类学分析的章节(第十章)和作者B关于古角病学的一章(第Y)的一章。

In 2003, our journal published an article (in English) co-authored by author B on the paleopathology of the same composer.

案件

疑似抄袭

06-32.

This is regarding a case of suspected plagiarism in our journal.

案件

Possible plagiarism

06-27

一个中东作者在不同的科目上提交了四篇论文,同时(两个单一作者,两个与其他作者)。在内部评估期间,有人指出,其中两篇论文与先前公布的论文非常相似。完整论文的全部检查明确表明,甚至这些论文已经取得了一篇论文,即使是从已发表的论文复制。软件未使用。

案件

潜在的抄袭

06-24

In 2003, Journal A published an original article. In 2006, the editor received a complaint of plagiarism relating to a case report published by Journal B in 2000.

这两个文章的引入有一个相同的段落,讨论中的一些段落是相似的。

案件

一个并行出版物的情况?

06-19

Paper A appeared in a foreign language journal, together with an English abstract. Paper B was submitted to us, and one of our referees alerted us to the similar content.

案件

审计2的伦理批准

06-16

发达国家的一组群体在一组250名患有先天性心脏病的250名妇女中进行了妊娠及其结果。系列中有四名妇女死亡。决定写下审计。

案件

抄袭的案例

06-10

有五位作者的论文从一个中东国家的大学医院提交。其中一名审稿人抱怨说,它广泛抄袭了他自己的出版物之一。考试表明,大约30%的文本和表格已被复制。结果是原创的,在某些情况下,已经简单地插入了抄袭文本。

案件

Patient consent

06-01

该期刊收到了具有特定综合症的患者的病例报告,其中患者患者对简单问题的近似答案。这种综合症被认为是一个分离情况,但其他人认为它反映了对精神症状的模拟。案件报告是一个撞到他车的个人,并遵循这一点,开发了记忆障碍和精神科审查的投诉,这综合征被诊断出来。

案件

重复出版物

06-02

收到一封电子邮件从一个读者表明possible duplicate publication of an article that appeared in the journal in 2004, and a similar publication that appeared in another journal in 2003. The Editor immediately wrote to the author, and to the editor of the other journal, expressing his concerns. The author responded five days later saying that he did not believe that the papers were duplicates.

页面