-
Case
Surprising results and a new area of research
A paper described an unusual approach to disease modulation in an experimental animal model. The apparently clear cut findings were somewhat surprising. The authors also seem to have used high and low power photomicrographs of the same tissue sections to illustrate completely different experiments within the study. This occurred twice in the paper. Furthermore, this particular area of study was… -
Case
Duplication, revision and resubmission?
提交了一种原稿，其中描述了一种药物对常见癌症的小鼠模型中细胞周转和细胞凋亡的影响。其中一位审稿人指出，同一位作者的一个非常相似的论文已在同一专业中的另一个期刊上发表，并致力于在两篇论文中强调文本块的麻烦。在一篇论文中，作者有回购...... -
Case
重复的出版物和现在欺诈？
两篇文章发表在两个不同的。篇研究就是这么说的als. The articles had been submitted within days of each other, and were subsequently peer reviewed, revised, and published within a month of each other. The authors failed to reference the closely related article as submitted or in press, and the editors of the two journals were unaware of the other article. After publication the editor… -
Case
The double review
提交人提交了1997年2月的审查。在同行评审后，它被录取为11月份出版。同位提交了关于类似主题的审查 - 足够相似的是，1997年9月，内容与日志B有很大的重叠。在同行评审后，B 1998年1月接受了它。既不知道并行纸张编辑。jou ... -
Case
Triplicate publication with possibly different data in each
A paper describing an outbreak of infectious disease was submitted to three journals. The submission to one journal described the index case; the submission to another included investigation and follow up of other cases and contacts in the country where the outbreak had occurred. The third paper looked at the spread of the disease into other countries. A considerable amount of the epidem… -
Case
作者身份，重复出版和版权的问题
In 1995 a group of nine authors published a paper in a leading general medical journal. Copyright was granted by all authors to the journal. In 1998 the senior author received a complimentary copy of a recently published book. One of the chapters was essentially a reprint of the original paper. It was attributed to the sixth, first and second authors. Neither the first nor second author (the gu… -
Case
Patients with vitiligo treated with anti-fungal drugs by a general practitioner
A letter was submitted for publication in which a general practitioner described how he treated patients with vitiligo “simultaneously with an anti-fungal and anti-bacterial medicament over a prolonged period.”He has done this because:“As is now known,a fungus resembles the human being genetically and there is a possibility that a fungus can hide in the melanocyte (analogically as is being do… -
Case
在以前公开实验后的四名患者的不确定治疗
A medically qualifed author submitted a paper in which he described the treatment of four cases of “pesticide poisoning presented as ME.”These four cases had doubtful sounding evidence of pesticide poisoning. The author treated them with a mixture of choline and ascorbic acid. He did this because: “Between the years 1968 and 1973 I had carried out a number of unpublished experiments on patie… -
Case
Possible duplicate publication?
一份期刊接受了一篇论文，然后发现同一位作者的一个非常相似的论文已在去年的另一个杂志上发表。后一期刊作为一份简短的报告，当前计划将其作为一份全文发布。全纸对口腔和颌面外科医生进行了扩展的研究，而简短的报告只看过DEN ...的态度...... -
Case
Grounds for retraction?
The co-author of a paper has contacted us about a paper he published 5 years ago together with a researcher who has now been convicted of serious professional misconduct by the GMC for research misconduct. The co-author is worried that the paper he co-authored may also be fraudulent. The research was in two parts. The first was analysed by a doctor not convicted of research miscon… -
Case
Unethical research
We have received a study in which patients with healed duodenal ulcers were randomly allocated to treatment with either placebo or ranitidine. Patients were also categorised as to whether they were type A or type B personality; the hypotheses being tested was that patients who were type A might be more likely to relapse. Patients did not have their H pylori status determined. Subjects we… -
Case
An author plagiarising the work of the reviewer?
提交人作为纸张提交了他的博士论文的一部分。期刊章节编辑要求博士主管审查该文件。这引起了审查人员对本文提出了各种索赔的非常激烈的回应：作者没有学分他在工作中使用的一项测试，没有适当承认的同事，也许应该是共同作者的同事...... -
Case
冗余出版物?
本文讨论了药物X在条件Y中的使用，提交给杂志A.这是一个双盲随机对照试验，提出了129名妇女的1年的结果。它发现药物X条件Y.作者在J期刊上发表了类似的论文，在提交本文之前2个月。“B论文在601名妇女中研究了2年的妇女的同一问题...... -
Case
抄袭
提交给x杂志x的稿件非常类似于已在Y期刊Y中发表的论文。杂志X的一个同行评审员注意到的相似之处。该文件已被杂志拒绝，但编辑现在已写入每个作者要求解释并告诉他们，如果不需要的解释，她会通知院长... -
Case
The critical commentary
我们接受了对出版物的系统审查，并委托了随附的评论。评注的作者注意到，在系统审查中包含特定随机对照试验，而在另一个期刊中发布的试验版本的重复版本被排除在外，因为随机化不足。评论的作者指出了这一点...... -
Case
未能得到有限公司nsent from an ethics committee
This case was described to me by an author who is about to submit a paper. He has discovered that a member of his team has produced a lot of fraudulent data for other studies, and has forged consent from ethics committees. This researcher has been reported to the GMC and his case is pending. The problem with the paper about to be submitted to us is that the fraudulent researcher falsely claime… -
Case
冗余出版物
I received a letter from a reader in November 1997, pointing out that a paper published in the BMJ in 1996 was substantially the same as a paper published in another journal in 1994. We have examined both papers and discovered: (1) The papers describe the same cohort. There are the same numbers of patients, recruited in the same year; they have the same range of starting and finishing blood pr… -
Case
Unethical research undertaken by a single handed GP
我们已经从GP测试了一篇论文测试的假设，因为24,25胆总管醇与市售他汀类药物具有类似的结构，它可以作为HMA共氧化酶的抑制剂。他在他的实践中筛选了350名患者，并确定了77名胆固醇浓度以上6.5mmol每升。他们三十三人同意2周后返回第二秒。他们…