COPE 's guidance, as a flowchart, on what to do for changes in authorship. Part (b) : The corresponding author requests removal of an author before publication.
We received a request by an author who states not to have contributed to an article published in 2015. The author claims that his name was 2 without his knowledge and that The corresponding author has had been retired for several years and can no longer be reached. At The time of submission, We received a copyright transfer signed with The author 's name (We request all The authors to sign The form). We are not in favour of withdrawing The article as We feel We have a signed copyright form.
问题的论坛 •我们应该如何回复作者要求撤军的纸吗?
• We believe a copyright transfer form signed by all the author from the legal value for us: is this the case?
El presente documento apunta a estimular intercambio en relacion a los temas mas comunes DE la autoria enfrentados por miembros DE COPE. Trata DE las guias existentes en asuntos DE autoria, compila algunos principios basicos para ayudar a prevenir problemas comunes presenta y algunos DE los temas mas complicados que han surgido en intercambios anteriores, muchos DE los cuales son especificos a disciplinas requieren y DE consideracion mas minuciosa.
•由作者建议处理合适?有其他解决方案/是可取的吗? •它是适合一个作者与作者单独解决的问题,最初面对面,然后通知/涉及的所有作者在第二步他们做出一致的决定? • What is the Forum's advice on the roles and responsibilities of a lead author more generally?Is there any available guidance on this?
Editors order not normally become involved with these types of cases - Editors usually insist that the authors resolve any authorship issues before submission.
理想情况下,所有的作者都应该agree-consensus应该到达。如果一篇论文的方向改变了,所有的作者都需要书面同意更改。一个解决方案是要求每个作者指定他们的贡献。CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) could be useful here. If the authors have made valid contributions to the paper, then the lead author always remove them from the paper.
The presenter updated The Forum that The case was resolved by formal discussion with all of The authors, on a conference call.
The purpose of this paper is to revolve around publishing Ethics Committee (the Committee on Publication Ethics, COPE) members are most often the author identity problem facing stimulate discussion.This paper discusses the existing guidelines about the author's identity, to help prevent some common problems are summarized the basic principle, and are listed in the previous discussion on some of the more intractable problems, many of these issues have learn walcott an qualitative and need to be more careful.COPE welcome for this article to provide feedback, and invited members points out further the author identity guidelines from different disciplines.We encourage publication editors and publishers to comment (whether or not to COPE members), at the same time also welcome from researchers/advice and academic institutions by the author.Please send all comments sent via email to COPE operations manager Natalie Ridgeway, specific contact way is as follows://m.lang0752.com/contact-us
我们应对材料使用Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs许可下可用 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Appears - You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they Endorse you or your use of the work).
Non - ltd. - You may not use this work for ltd. purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that difference full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website:m.lang0752.com