后发表一篇文章,作者contacted the journal asking to correct their surname. Author A’s name consists of two parts, but only one was included in the publication. The editor accepted this request but asked all authors to agree to publication of an erratum. Author B (the corresponding author) immediately replied, disagreeing with publication of such an erratum. Author A informed the journal that he had a similar ongoing disagreement with Author B over Author A’s name in another journal. Author A also provided proof of legal name. According to our records, Author A’s name was incorrect on submission and Author A did not ask to correct it before publication (and had confirmed that the submission details were correct). When asked for an explanation of this, Author A claims not to have noticed the mistake at that time.
As the authors were unable to agree authorship among themselves, the journal contacted the institution where the research took place (also where author B is currently affiliated). Author A, and some of the other co-authors, have since left the institution. The institution discussed the case with the authors still at this institution, but stated they were not allowed to contact authors who had left (including Author A). The institution forwarded the journal a statement signed by Author B and the other authors still at the institution with a similar statement to those received previously stating that Author A did not meet authorship criteria.
编辑最关心的是，通过改名，是否会提升其他作者的地位？编辑需要作者确认谁做了什么以及作者名单的正确顺序。论坛建议，在该条附录末尾的一张表格中明确说明作者身份和贡献者身份将是有益的。要求每位作者详细说明他们的贡献。CRediT(Contributor Roles Taxonomy) could be useful here.
Competition for last author place is increasing in some geographic areas and some disciplines. Changing authorship order or removing an author without adequate institutional investigation is not advisable, however, the correction of the one author’s name could be corrected with an erratum simply stating the correction. Because there is an ongoing dispute as to who actually participated as an author, the case needs to be further investigated by the institution and if the institution is unresponsive, the case should be escalated to a regional or national authority if available. The editor could inform the authors that the journal plans to issue an Expression of Concern about the authorship dispute, pending an investigation by the institution. This may encourage the authors to come to an agreement.
我们的COPE材料可在知识共享署名非商业性NoDerivs许可下使用 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 归属-你必须以作者或许可人指定的方式对作品进行归属（但不能以任何方式表明他们认可你或你对作品的使用）。 Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works — 你不能改变，改变，或在此基础上建立工作。我们要求您提供完整的认证，以处理我们网站的链接：公共道德.org
我们的COPE材料可在知识共享署名非商业性NoDerivs许可下使用 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 归属-你必须以作者或许可人指定的方式对作品进行归属（但不能以任何方式表明他们认可你或你对作品的使用）。 Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works — 你不能改变，改变，或在此基础上建立工作。我们要求您提供完整的认证，以处理我们网站的链接：公共道德.org
我们的COPE材料可在知识共享署名非商业性NoDerivs许可下使用 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by nc nd/4.0/ Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they 认可你或你对作品的使用）。
应付's guidance, as a flowchart, on changes in authorship, Part (a) The corresponding author requests the addition of an extra author before publication.
我们的COPE材料可在知识共享署名非商业性NoDerivs许可下使用 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 归属-你必须以作者或许可人指定的方式对作品进行归属（但不能以任何方式表明他们认可你或你对作品的使用）。 Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works — 你不能改变，改变，或在此基础上建立工作。我们要求您提供完整的认证，以处理我们网站的链接：公共道德.org
我们的COPE材料可在知识共享署名非商业性NoDerivs许可下使用 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 归属-你必须以作者或许可人指定的方式对作品进行归属（但不能以任何方式表明他们认可你或你对作品的使用）。 Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works — 你不能改变，改变，或在此基础上建立工作。我们要求您提供完整的认证，以处理我们网站的链接：公共道德.org
我们的COPE材料可在知识共享署名非商业性NoDerivs许可下使用 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ 归属-你必须以作者或许可人指定的方式对作品进行归属（但不能以任何方式表明他们认可你或你对作品的使用）。 Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works — 你不能改变，改变，或在此基础上建立工作。我们要求您提供完整的认证，以处理我们网站的链接：公共道德.org