你在这里

Allegations of misconduct

Journals should have a clearly described process for handling allegations, however they are brought to the journal's or publisher’s attention. Journals must take seriously allegations of misconduct pre-publication and post-publication. Policies should include how to handle allegations from whistleblowers.

Our core practices

核心实践是政策和实践期刊和出版商需要,以达到出版伦理的最高标准。我们包括案件,咨询,日常练习的指导,教育模块和关于题单问题的事件,支持期刊和出版商履行其政策。
案件

审阅者要求添加多个引用自己的工作

19-01

A handling editor noticed a reviewer report where the reviewer instructed the author to cite multiple publications by the same reviewer in their manuscript. The handling editor noted a similar instance involving this reviewer from the past and requested the editorial office to look into his reviewing history.

About this resource

完整页历史记录

  • 2019年3月28日

    Created buttons for search and added PDF

News

研究数据:机构是管理和出版后担忧的关键

Guest article

Susan Garfinkel, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President for Research Compliance, The Ohio State University

News

研究完整性问题:你打电话给谁?

Guest article

Lauran Qualkenbush - 西北大学研究诚信办公室的Ario和主任

About this resource

作者Developed by COPE Council
版本1October 2018
如何引用这个
应对理事会。作者:王莹,编辑部伦理伦理的一般方法。版本1. 2018.https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.24

我们的COPE材料可用于根据Creative Commons atjection-noncommercial-noderivs许可使用
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
Non-commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works —
您可能不会改变,转换或构建这项工作。我们要求您提供完全认证,以应对本网站的链接:publicationeThics.org.

完整页历史记录

  • 23 May 2019

    第一款版本2018年10月

案件

自我抄袭和疑似萨拉米出版

18-13

Journal A accepted a manuscript with six authors in June 2017, which was published in January 2018. Several months later, the editors of journal A found that journal B had published paper B, which shared striking similarities to paper A. Journal B accepted paper B in November 2017 and published it in February 2018. The first author of paper B was different but the remaining four authors were from paper A.

案件

提交预先提交询问

18-12

我们最近收到了一份作者的提交咨询,他被确定为与书面文件相当缺乏经验。乍一看,这是一个相当标准的提交预先询问。提交人提到了他们据称两篇论文的标题,并想知道我们是否可能对他们感兴趣。

News

研究诚信,2017-19届会议局的第六次报告

Following a 10 month inquiry, the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee has issued recommendations to strengthen requirements and improve compliance with the existing 2012 Concordat to Support Research Integrity [完整的报告]。

案件

举办机构不会调查的举报人的科学误解

18-08

一份期刊收到了对匿名个人的对科学的不当行为指控,他们来自撰写论文的小组(机构-1,有两项参与本研究的机构)。该电子邮件表示,文章的科学基地是不可靠的。本文目前与作者在第一轮审查后正在修改论文,并需要额外的实验。

页面