应对摘要：在实践中出版伦理。2014年1月（第2卷，第1期）|应对：出版委员会伦理委员会

Letter from the Chair

Welcome to the firstCOPE Digest: Publication Ethics in Practiceof 2014.

2013 was a year of extraordinary activity in research and publication ethics. It felt like the year when scrutiny of papers and journals publicly (and, increasingly, anonymously) passed from being unusual to being part of academic discourse. Along with that came a纠正和撤回升级以及期刊上的灵魂是关于这对学术界是一个好的或坏事的期刊。

At COPE we have consistently taken the approach that our overall aim is the practical support and education of our members so that they can do their jobs, but we also aim to take a lead in new issues to do with publishing ethics. Two of our initiatives from last year reflect both the new challenges but also provide some practical advice: a set ofprinciples of transparency for journals我们与其他三个出版组织一起发布;以及我们的论坛之一的讨论how editors might collaborate best when issues arise across multiple journals(we shall also be collaborating with theCouncil of Science Editors[CSE]在他们的会议上致力于主题annual conferencein May 2014).

本月的通讯在普通范围内广泛而广泛地宽阔。我希望你能找到一些你的日常编辑工作。我们总是欢迎反馈and look forward to meeting you at one of the manyevents我们今年计划了。

重点

eLearning course

COPE is offering non-members working on scholarly journals the chance to try out our eLearning programme with free access to the module, 'An Introduction to Publication Ethics'. This module aims to highlight the importance of ethical publishing as well as outline the definitions of misconduct. Virginia Barbour, Chair of COPE, says, “The aim of the free taster module is to give potential members a feeling for the extensive benefits that the organisation can offer them". Do you know who might commit publication misconduct? You can find out by trying this free introductory module at (//m.lang0752.com/resources/elearning/introduction-publication-ethics-0)。一直非常积极的反馈模块。Editors and publishers who are members of COPE have offered their staff and editorial board members the opportunity to access all of the self-paced learning modules as a benefit of COPE membership. Successful completion of each module is acknowledged with a certificate of completion.

应对论坛discussions

At the beginning of each Forum, COPE discusses a specific topic. Typically raised by one of our members, the topic is intended to stimulate discussion during and post Forum, potentially leading to a discussion document, or more formal guidelines being developed by COPE. The topic for discussion at the last Forum was 'How should a journal deal with persistent complainers?'. You can view the summary and existing comments, as well as post any comments you may have here://m.lang0752.com/forum-discussion-topic-how-should-journal-deal-persistent-complainers。我们鼓励您添加您的意见并进一步贡献讨论。

在新闻中

Real authors?

TheORCID项目是为了确保作者是真实的和管理作者数据库。研究人员和贡献者现在可以将教育和就业隶属关系联系起来的orcid记录。
http://orcid.org/blog/2013/12/09/organizational-affiliations-now-part-orcid-record

写给作者

In collaboration with COPE, theCouncil of Science Editors“（CSE）编辑政策委员会制定了示例通信，涉及期刊编辑可能面临的具体情况，例如作者，手稿重叠等。
http://www.councelscienceeditors.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3335

COPE resource:样本字母

The case for two types of retractions

Setting the record straight with integrity. Authors acknowledge their mistakes and do the right thing to set the record straight.
http://thenode.biologists.com/setting-the-record-straight-an-Interview-with-daniel-st-johnston/discussion/

COPE资源：收回指南bob官方app

Retractions

More retractions from Shigeaki Kato - image manipulation detected inNature纸张引用98次。
http://retractionwatch.com/2013/12/11/shigeaki-kato-notches-five-more-retractions-including-one-in-nature/#more-17106

COPE资源：收回指南bob官方app

人类研究的道德批准监管：全球变异

Regulations regarding what type of study requires ethical approval vary worldwide. In some countries, all studies require ethical approval, but in other countries, not. Journal editorial teams need to be aware of this and not reject manuscripts because of a misunderstanding of local regulations. In the UK, the健康研究权威提供指导（参见研究伦理委员会治理安排的第2.3节：统一版）。
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-research- ethics-committees-governance-Arrangements.

Plagiarism and speciality

Papers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) plagiarize more than those in the social sciences, according to a study published in the学术目的英语杂志
 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s1475158513000465.

应资源：
剽窃讨论文件
 eLearning course

What's been happening at COPE

COPE Council elections

Voting for the 2 vacancies onCOPE councilis now open and will remain open until Friday 24 January 2014. All Full and Associate Members of COPE are entitled to vote. Please note that there is only one vote per journal title, even for journals with multiple editors. The vote should be cast by the member editor, who is usually the Editor-in-Chief, or otherwise by the nominated contact for the journal. Editors of more than one journal will have a vote for each journal.

Each Full and Associate Member with voting rights is entitled to vote for UP TO 2 CANDIDATES on the ballot paper. The candidates receiving the highest numbers of votes shall be deemed elected to council.
请前往网站施放您的投票//m.lang0752.com/content/election-cope-council-members-january-2014

应对论坛s by webinar

2013年，应对季度季度三个Forumsvia webinar. They proved to be very successful, and have achieved one of our main aims - reaching more of our global membership. Our March Forum saw members from 14 different countries (attendance 50), the September Forum reached members from 18 different countries (attendance 67) and December saw 60 members attend from 17 different countries. Participation has been from countries as wide-ranging as Australia, Cameroon, Iceland, Japan, Myanmar, Pakistan and South Africa, among others. For the future, we plan to conduct all of our quarterly Forums in this way. We also plan to meet with members face to face at meetings around the world.

If you have attended one of our webinars, we are always keen to receive your feedback.You can contact us here。

COPE December Forum

The cases presented at the COPE December Forum, along with the advice given and together with updates on previous cases, are now on the COPE website. You can also listen to the discussion of each case by downloading the audio.

NEW CASES
13-14 Ethical concerns about a study involving human subjects
13-16两个审稿人报告包含大量的逐字文本重叠
 13-17误判作者和未经授权使用数据
 13-18 Claim of plagiarism in published article
13-19识别在图中发布的患者信息

UPDATES
12-34 Journal refuses to correct the record
13-01 Paper submitted for publication without consent or knowledge of co-author
13-08异常频繁地通过单个作者提交文章
 13-10作者争议
 13-12 Omitted author
13-13案例是抄袭？

XXV印度生理学学会年会，2013年12月9日。

会议和研讨会是由卡闵eni Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpally, India, and endorsed by COPE. It was led by应对国际咨询小组成员，Kusal Das教授, along with Professor Deepak of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences. The 26 physiology participants discussed authorship criteria and some of the COPE cases. All found it very interesting and worthwhile.Professor Das's full report can be read here。

2013年前5例

Food for thought: the top 5 cases discussed at COPE forum in 2013.

13-01 Paper submitted for publication without consent or knowledge of co-authors

A co-author complains that the corresponding author (a PhD student) submitted research for publication without their consent or that of the other seven co-authors. The co-author has submitted a slightly updated version to another journal with a higher impact factor. The complaint includes the fact that the corresponding author was not allowed to publish the research due to an agreement with the research centre where the research was carried out.
http:///m.lang0752.com/case/paper-submited-publication-without-consent-or-knowledge-co-authors.

13-04通过随后的试验行为审计调用发布审判的调查结果

A random inspection by the national regulator 3 years after publication reveals inconsistencies and lapses in the conduct of a randomised controlled trial.
http:///m.lang0752.com/case/findings-published-trial-called-question-subsequent-audit-trial-conde

13-05编辑为纸张的作者

A subject editor, who oversaw a manuscript, inadvertently becomes a co-author on the same paper. The manuscript slipped through two rounds of the journal’s editorial process.
//m.lang0752.com/case/editor-author-paper

13-08异常频繁地通过单个作者提交文章

A sixth year medical student submitted 29 original articles and 17 Letters to the Editor within 8 months, an average of five submissions per month. Higher authorities are unresponsive.
//m.lang0752.com/case/unusually-frequent-submission-articles-single-author

13-11 A case of salami slicing

两个提交的稿件模仿了发布的文件，并被发现报告了相同的数据，但呈现为两个不同的论文。
http:///m.lang0752.com/case/case-salami-slicing.

You are here

应对摘要：在实践中出版伦理。January 2014 (Vol. 2, Issue 1)