You are here

HomePeer review processesPeer review

Peer review

News

In the news: September 2018 Digest

Peer review processes

Is there a problem around diversity and inclusion in peer review?
#PeerReviewWeek18
https://twitter.com/PeerRevWeek/status/1031911897149394944

Gender and international diversity improves equity in peer review
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/08/29/400515

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.27

Cómo reconocer la potencial manipulación del proceso de revisión por pares

Los pares revisores pueden ser sugeridos por:

About this resource

AuthorDeveloped by COPE Council
Version 1September 2017
How to cite this
COPE Council. How to spot potential manipulation of the peer review process (Latin American Spanish). Version 1. 2017https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.27
Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
非商业——你可能不使用这个为com工作mercial purposes. No Derivative Works —
You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website:m.lang0752.com

Full page history

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.28

    Qué considerar al ser invitado a hacer una revisión por pares de un manuscrito

    Related resource

    要求同行评审时需要考虑什么手cript (English)

    About this resource

    AuthorDeveloped by COPE Council
    Version 1August 2018
    How to cite this
    COPE Council. What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript (Latin American Spanish). Version 1. 2018.https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.28

    Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
    https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
    Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
    非商业——你可能不使用这个为com工作mercial purposes. No Derivative Works —
    You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website:m.lang0752.com

    Full page history

      News

      COPE Education Subcommittee focus: Peer Review

      Not surprisingly, COPE has substantial resources available regarding peer review andpeer review processesare one of our 10 core practices. Peer review comes in many shapes and forms, and the process varies widely among different publications. The fundamental principle of transparency is critical given this variety. COPE asserts that the peer review process must be “transparently described and well managed”.

      News

      Peer Review Week 2018: new and revised COPE resources

      Peer Review Week 2018 offered us an opportunity to consider this year’s theme of Diversity in multiple ways and to reflect on what gaps in our resources might exist. Here is a list of what we reviewed, completed, and revised related to peer review.

      News

      New: Spanish resources

      COPE Resources: Spanish

      Spanish translations of COPE resources: flowcharts, ethical guidelines for peer reviewers, How to Spot Manipulation of the Peer Review Process, What to Consider when asked to Peer Review a Manuscript, What Constitutes Authorship? discussion document and our Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

      News

      COPE endorses EASE SAGER guidelines

      COPE endorses the Sex and Gender Equity in Research(SAGER) guidelinesdeveloped by the European Association of Science Editors (EASE).

      DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.10

      Guías Éticas para Revisores Pares

      Una Introducción
      Los revisores pares juegan un papel en asegurar la integridad del registro académico. El proceso de revisión por pares depende en gran medida en la confianza y disposición a participar de la comunidad académica y requiere que todos los involucrados se comporten de modo responsable y ético. Los revisores pares juegan un papel central y crítico en el proceso de revisión por pares, pero pueden llegar a asumir ese papel sin orientación y tener poco presentes sus obligaciones éticas.

      About this resource

      Written byCOPE Council
      Version 2September 2017
      Version 1March 2013
      How to cite this
      COPE Council. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers (Spanish). Version 2 September 2017https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.10

      Our COPE materials are available to use under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license
      https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/
      Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
      非商业——你可能不使用这个为com工作mercial purposes. No Derivative Works —
      You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. We ask that you give full accreditation to COPE with a link to our website:m.lang0752.com

      Full page history

      • 4 December 2020

        New category

      News

      Letter from the COPE co-Chairs: September 2018

      #PeerReviewWeek18

      Peer Review Week 2018, is here! And the question PRW is asking us all is “What does diversity mean to you?”

      Pages