Since COPE drafted a discussion paper on the topic of掠夺性出版in 2019, many more scholarly papers have been published on various aspects of this issue so there is no lack of research into the practice. However, while research may be necessary, it is not a sufficient response to the problems associated with predatory publishers. Consequently, and more recently, the dialogue has turned to more practice based solutions.
What are the next steps that COPE, or other industry organisations, might consider as a response to the continued flourishing and growth of predatory journals, conferences, and publishers?
应该解决和/或其他行业组织佛吗rm a global compact of signatories to commit to the practice of research and publication integrity and further to the active marginalisation of predatory publishing within the scholarly communities of universities, editors, and publishers? The Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing may be considered the de facto standards for membership among organisations, such as COPE, OASPA, DOAJ, and WAME, but this would be a proactive advancement of these principles, not just as membership criteria but as global standards for publication integrity.
Should COPE and/or other industry organisations act as a third party retraction service for authors who have unknowingly published with a predatory publisher which will neither withdraw nor retract the articles at the request of the authors? This would include publishers who commit to publications which never appear.
该NIH statement also encourages stakeholders to help authors find credible journals and mentionsThink Check Submit,这反过来包括检查期刊或出版商是否属于承认行业倡议,如应对徒。应对有一个重要且挑战的作用,也需要多次利益攸关方的参与。此外,需要提醒人们检查期刊/出版商确实是通过COPE网站的应对会员,而不是依赖于期刊/出版商网站的应对或可能滥用应对应对的徽标。应对成员有一个个性化的应对徽标/徽章。
Comments
该学术出版的透明度和最佳实践原则被认为是“建立行业最佳实践”的例子以及ICMJE在医学期刊上进行的行为,报告,编辑和出版学术工作的建议,在NIH中的“NIH资助研究产生的文章出版声明”(https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-18-011.html). The Medline review process (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/lstrc/j_sel_faq.html.)还包括检查期刊符合两种指南。bob官方app因此,透明度原则确实用作四个创作组织之外的团体的基准。
该NIH statement also encourages stakeholders to help authors find credible journals and mentionsThink Check Submit,这反过来包括检查期刊或出版商是否属于承认行业倡议,如应对徒。应对有一个重要且挑战的作用,也需要多次利益攸关方的参与。此外,需要提醒人们检查期刊/出版商确实是通过COPE网站的应对会员,而不是依赖于期刊/出版商网站的应对或可能滥用应对应对的徽标。应对成员有一个个性化的应对徽标/徽章。
在网络研讨会中提到:
IAP(互通伙伴关系)呼叫所有研究人员才能完成在线调查(可提供7种语言),以“帮助打击掠夺性学术期刊和会议”。截止日期是2020年12月31日。请参阅:
https://www.interacademies.org/project/predatorypublishing.