-
Flowcharts
What to do if you suspect peer review manipulation
如果您怀疑同行评审过程或发布后，您可以根据对等审查操作为何进行操作的流程图。相关资源如何现货对等审查过程的潜在操纵...... -
Flowcharts
What to do if you suspect image manipulation in a published article
如果您怀疑已被操纵已发布的文章中的图像，请以何种方式为流程图的形式引导。该流程图仅涉及促进与数字摄影图像相关的问题的情况（例如，图像内的部分复制，或使用相同的图像...... -
Flowcharts
如何识别潜在的作者问题
如何识别潜在的作者问题. Clear policies (that allow for transparency around who contributed to the work and in what capacity) should be in place for requirements for authorship and contributorship as well as processes for managing potential disputes.… -
Flowcharts
Systematic manipulation of the publication process
Manipulation of the publication process is a relatively new form of misconduct affecting the publishing industry. These guidelines represent an important first step towards encouraging openness and collaboration between publishers to address this phenomenon. Systematic manipulation of the publication process is where an individual or a group of individuals have repeatedly used dis… -
Flowcharts
General approach to publication ethics for the Editorial Office
指导详细说明了编辑部组织的建议方法，以遵守应对应对的核心实践。应对有许多资源，以协助出版商和编辑在出版物中的道德问题做出决定，包括指导方针，bob官方app -
Flowcharts
How to spot potential manipulation of the peer review process
Peer reviewers may be suggested by: the Editor handling the manuscript; authors on submission of their manuscript to a journal; another reviewer who is unable to peer review the manuscript. While there is an expectation that everyone involved in the process acts with integrity, the peer review process can be susceptible to manipulation as discussed at… -
Flowcharts
What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript
应对当您被要求审查稿件时要考虑的稿件的指导，并呈现为流程图并铺设决策过程中的步骤，以确定您是否应该接受请求。（2017年9月1日）看到同行...... -
Flowcharts
Suspected fabricated data in a submitted manuscript
COPE's guidance, as a flowchart, on what to do if you suspect fabricated data in a submitted manuscript… -
Flowcharts
如果读者嫌疑人在公布的文章中犯下了未公开的利益冲突，该怎么办
COPE's guidance on what to do if a reader suspects that there is an undisclosed conflict of interest in a published article. (Version 2, 2013) To avoid future problems: always get signed statements of conflicts of interest from all authors and reviewers before publication. Ensure that journal guidelines include a clear definition of what a conflict of interest is.… -
Flowcharts
Responding to whistleblowers - concerns raised via social media
COPE's guidelines, as a flowchart, on how to respond to whistleblowers when concerns are raised about a published article on a social media site. How should you respond when a published article is criticised on social media or a post-publication peer review site(s)? The criticism could include anonymous or not anonymous concerns about scientific soundness or allegations of plagiarism, fi… -
Flowcharts
回应举报人 - 直接提出的担忧
How should you respond when concerns are raised by a whistleblower about a published article directly via email to the editor or publisher? This could include anonymous or not anonymous concerns about scientific soundness or allegations of plagiarism, figure manipulation or other forms of misconduct.… -
Flowcharts
How to spot authorship problems
编辑不能警察uthor or contributor listings for every submission but may sometimes have suspicions that an author list is incomplete or includes undeserving (guest or gift) authors. The COPE flowchart 'Suspected ghost, guest or gift authorship' suggests actions for these situations. The points in th… -
Flowcharts
如果您怀疑审阅者已拨出作者的想法或数据，该怎么办？
COPE's guidance as a flowchart on what to do if you suspect a reviewer has appropriated an author’s ideas or data. The instruction to reviewers should state that submitted material must be treated in confidence and may not be used in any way until it has been published … -
Flowcharts
在提交的稿件中疑似冗余出版物
如果您在提交的稿件中怀疑冗余（重复）出版物，应对该怎么办。作者的说明应该说明期刊上的冗余出版物的政策。要求机构的政策可能有助于。要求作者核实他们的稿件是原创的，尚未在其他地方发布。