Case

• Case

  Disagreement between a reviewer and an author

  1997

  We sent a paper to a reviewer, who suggested that we should reject the paper, principally because he thought it “virtually identical to a paper in press by the same authors”. We rejected the paper with these comments. The author came back to us saying that he did not believe that he had had a fair review of his paper because, he thought, the reviewer had a conflict of interest. He wrote: “The…

  • Conflicts of interest / Competing interests
  • Post-publication discussions and corrections
• Case

  Should we have had author consent for a randomised controlled trial of a peer review?

  1997

  A medical journal conducted a randomised controlled trial of papers submitted to it without getting consent from the authors concerned. An author found out and objected. Should the journal have sought consent from its authors? … Maybe this is taking matters too far and it is simply barmy to seek author consent. Should notice of this trial been given in advance and the authors been given t…

  • 亚洲bob平台
  • Peer review processes
• Case

  Can a scientific paper be published anonymously?

  1997

  Two authors wrote to me to ask if they could publish a scientific paper anonymously. The authors work in a general practice that had switched its cervical cytology contract from one laboratory to another. Some time after the switch they noticed that the rate of abnormal smears had almost doubled. This has profound implications for the practice and particularly for the women whose smears were po…

  • Authorship and contributorship

Pages