GPP3和TOP
COPE认可公司赞助的医学研究交流的良好出版规范：GPP3[1]。
作者在集团工作orate–academic research collaborations must follow appropriate ethical standards. GPP3 describes such standards, and promotes the ethical practices established by organisations like COPE, ICMJE, and WMA.
在许多建议中，GPP3强调对作者必须归属的控制;介绍通过稿件准备和文章出版物收集什么文件的指导;讨论出版规划和专业医疗作家扮演的作用以及作者留下责任的重要性;建议支持良好出版惯例的政策和程序;并指出“应报告所有临床试验”。GPP3更新并有助于从GPP2和GPP澄清早期的指导。
GPP3免费阅读内科学年鉴and ISMPP'sGPP3 website。
应付also endorses theTransparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines[2]. COPE的产生是为了帮助编辑处理出版伦理问题，其根本目的是确保出版文献的完整性。因此，它长期以来一直支持能够更好地报告研究的倡议，例如赤道网。最重要的指导方针bob官方app是欢迎这些原则进入更多基础科学，我们很高兴地支持他们并鼓励我们的会员在自己的准则中审议他们。
具体来说，我们支持清楚布局的表格不同水平的透明度期刊如何增加透明度。此外，我们不仅欢迎这些建议，而且还欢迎这些建议，而且还欢迎各种参与研究的其他人（例如，资助者）。
参考
1.Battisti WP、Wager E、Baltzer L、Bridges D、Cairns A、Carswell CI等。公司赞助医学研究交流的良好出版实践：GPP3。安实习生. 2015年8月11日在线发布doi:10.7326/M15-0288
2. Alter G等人（2015年10月24日）。透明度和开放性促销（顶部）指南。bob官方app从...获得https://cos.io/top/
Two new COPE flowcharts and two revisions
实现与…的合作BioMed Central从2014年9月开始，COPE制定了两个关于如何应对举报者的新流程图：
1）直接提出顾虑（//m.lang0752.com/files/RespondingToWhistleblowers_ConcernsRaisedDirectly.pdf)，和
2） 当这些问题通过社交媒体提出时(//m.lang0752.com/files/RespondingToWhistleblowers_ConcernsRaisedViaSocialMedia.pdf).
In addition, some small revisions have been made to the two flowcharts on 'What to do if you suspect redundant (duplicate) publication'.
Both the new and revised set of flowcharts have been added to the 'full set of flowcharts' PDF://m.lang0752.com/files/Full%20set%20of%20flowcharts_0.pdf
cope logo.
Did you know that you can now download a unique COPE logo for your journal or website?
On the COPE website, you can download a COPE logo with your membership number included and the date you joined COPE (example shown). This will demonstrate that you are a genuine member of COPE, and will send a signal to authors and reviewers that your journal upholds the highest ethical standards, that you intend to follow COPE’s Code of Conduct and that you will take appropriate action in cases of possible misconduct.
如果您想向您的徽标添加一些措辞，我们通常会建议以下内容：“本期刊是出版伦理委员会（应对）的成员，并订购//m.lang0752.com/"
您可以以优化的分辨率下载徽标，以便打印或上网。
下面是如何做到这一点:
- Log onto the COPE website as a member (you need to be the "manager" of your journal group)
- 转到日记页。
- On the right hand navigation bar, click “COPE logo download”.
- Download low and high resolutions of your personalised COPE logo.
2015年COPE澳大利亚研讨会报告
COPE澳大利亚研讨会“澳大利亚背景下的出版伦理”于2015年11月6日（星期五）在澳大利亚墨尔本维多利亚州图书馆举行；楼上是丛林骑兵内德·凯利的盔甲，楼下是关于研究伦理的精彩讨论。上午报告的总主题是弱势群体背景下的研究伦理。第一位发言人，来自原住民研究出版社，讨论了AIATSIS的道德出版准则(bob官方appAIATSISis the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Islander Studies, a body funded by the Australian government.) There were a large number of themes, but many of them came down to maintaining a constant dialogue with any Aboriginal authors you are working with, and accepting that their use of English may be different to what you may be expecting. The importance of giving back was also emphasised. The second speaker of the morning was Vicki Xafis, who spoke about informed consent in the context of paediatric patients, balancing the important information that may be published to the benefit of improved treatment (and career advancement) with sensitivity to the significant hardship being undergone by families with very sick children. The essence of the talk was that consent needs to be truly informed, and now may not be the right time.
下午是重点的变化，在作者周围问题。应对，弗吉尼亚巴伯was the first speaker. Ginny first looked at the changing nature of publication, developments such as兽人andCRediT以及试图提供作者指导的历史(如果听说作者身份是处理案件的最大类别，恐怕没有人会感到惊讶。）会议的第二位发言者是科佩兹·多年生，来自美国的保罗·泰勒墨尔本大学研究诚信办公室，谁报告了作者的研究普鲁斯articles (which list respective author contributions), and the finding that only a small minority of authors would be rated as authors under the current guidelines for medical journals from theICMJE.-one具体的指导方针。bob官方app然后保罗继续概述正在墨尔本大学开发的一系列务实的一系列政策https://policy.unimelb.edu.au/MPF1181。
The presentations were then followed by the popular COPE Forum workshops, based on five cases that had been brought to COPE over the past few years.
最后，非常感谢Wiley Melbourne组织这次会议，并感谢主持人。
应对，弗吉尼亚巴伯, opening the Australian seminar with an overview of COPE over the past year.
Pauline McGuire from原住民研究出版社, presenting at the COPE Australian Seminar.
Vicky Xafis,Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network从儿童、父母、临床医生等多个角度讨论了同意发表的问题。
Q&A with弗吉尼亚巴伯and Paul Taylor (Office for Research Ethics and Integrity, University of Melbourne)。
本月对伦理难题的回顾从一个论坛案例开始，该案例涉及未经伦理批准就提交研究手稿。论坛指出，不能指望编辑了解各国之间可能有所不同的国家准则。它建议编辑保证研究是按照国家指导方针进行的，可以要求伦理委员会写信，并有责任在必要时与各机构进行后续合作。掠夺性期刊上有两个项目：一个是期刊盗取死去医生的身份，另一个是期刊注册bob官方app兽人数字。编辑检查抄袭，但新的挑战是文章纺纱软件，并且有许多网站提供了这些服务。调查不当行为的成本是巨大的，因为riken学院发现。在涉嫌涉嫌研究欺诈缩回的遵循纸张所需的延长过程详述了BMJ公司关于1989年发表的一篇关于哺乳期母亲饮食和使用配方食品对高危婴儿特应性湿疹发展的影响的文章，重点文章是最近出版的关于传播公司赞助的医学研究的良好出版规范：GPP3，该规范已得到COPE的认可。
Journal of Spectroscopy and Molecular Physics
How to make biomedical research more reproducible
产业资助是否在削弱人们对科学的信任？
BMJ公司1989年关于泌乳植物泌乳症患者母饮的作用述评
Doctors, nurses, midwives and teachers are now legally required to report cases of female genital mutilation (FGM) to the police in England and Wales
对研究和出版的影响是什么？
Predatory journals and ORCID database concerns
Article spinning software attempts to hide academic plagiarism
里肯研究所¥1.45亿不可信的STAP干细胞研究
