这个月的消息是不同的,不仅有关于数据制造的案例,还具有内容营销的问题。关于临床试验出版物作者的倡议试图创造更标准化和透明的方法。作者也是本月案例的主题,关于想要在出版后更改其名称的作者。所以各种各样的有趣问题。
如果您想贡献物品或其他建议,请一如既往,请联系(contact us here).
这个月的消息是不同的,不仅有关于数据制造的案例,还具有内容营销的问题。关于临床试验出版物作者的倡议试图创造更标准化和透明的方法。作者也是本月案例的主题,关于想要在出版后更改其名称的作者。所以各种各样的有趣问题。
如果您想贡献物品或其他建议,请一如既往,请联系(contact us here).
Report from the COPE Education Committee
应付has its own YouTube Channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb7H4SgrFdn6RLp96vZZapQ)在那里,您可以在那里找到来自Cope研讨会和其他会议的演示文稿的视频。大多数视频长12至15分钟,并具有各种各样的扬声器。还可以订阅COPE频道,以在发生时获取新帖子的通知。成员还可以在研讨会页面中找到链接,但YouTube页面链接将您带到全部列表视频,您可以看到哪些视频最受欢迎,最近或与您的问题最相关。与撤回有关的主题似乎是最受观看的。
Four main descriptive categories: argumentation, social alignment, mercantile alignment, and data. It might be misleading to treat all citations as equal in quantitative citation analysis
http://sss.sagepub.com/content/44/4/625.Abstract.
And a press released article will see downloads for it jump from an average of 40 to around 7000
http://blog.alpsp.org/2014/10/the-truth-about-content-marketing-in.html
来自倍高的教育: thesaurophile and 10 others
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/11-new-hewords-for-academics-that-should-be-in-the-dictionary/2016610.article
一个特别的问题Publications
http://www.mdpi.com/journal/publications/special_issues/scientific-publishing
No evidence of ethical approval or consent, and scientific advisor in UK institution unaware of the study
http://www.springerplus.com/content/3/1/558/abstract.
Hidden jokes by authors: another challenge for editors and reviewers
http://www.timeshighrederyucation.co.uk/news/hiddent-leopard-skin-g-string-exposed/2016392.article
Publication rate of 38.9% no worse than other studies in orthopaedics
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315132
Not only lack of IRB approval but also data fabrication
http://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Citation/2014/11000/Editor_s_Note___Notice_of_Retraction.40.aspx
Thoughts on university global rankings and their manipulation
http://liorpachter.wordpress.com/2014/10/31/to-some-a-citation-is-worth-3-per-year/
该研究,由协同组出版MPIP, seeks to create a more standardised and transparent approach when determining authorship
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/197
University of Queensland没有证据表明已经进行了一项研究,几篇论文被撤回
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-11-06/former-uq-academic-granted-bail-over-fraud-charges/5871436
The Second International Congress on Publication Ethics will be held in Shiraz, Iran, on4–5 December 2014。This is a scientific partnership between COPE andShiraz University of Medical Sciences。All individuals working in the field of scientific medical publications as well as those interested in ethical approaches to scientific publications are welcome to attend.
有关更多详细信息并注册,请访问网站:http:///publicationethics.sums.ac.ir/en/
一种新的讨论文件,正在通过应对发表了关于作者周围的一些问题。'什么构成作者'(//m.lang0752.com/files/Authorship_DiscussionDocument.pdf) examines existing guidelines on authorship, puts together some basic principles to help prevent common problems, and sets out some of the more thorny issues that have come to light in previous discussions, many of which are discipline-specific and which require more nuanced consideration.
本文件旨在刺激应对会员面临的最常见的作者问题,并欢迎各位议员(和非成员)的反馈。我们鼓励编辑编辑和出版商发表评论,并欢迎研究人员/作者和学术机构的评论。请将所有评论发送给Natalie Ridgeway,应付Operations Manager here
Report from COPE council memberZoe Mullan.
10月13日星期一,应院长提前举办了半天的迷你研讨会International Society of Managing and Technical Editors(ISMTE)欧洲会议。该活动是免费的,应对ISMTEmembers and attracted 64 delegates to a rainy corner of London, UK, for an afternoon of talks and discussion. COPE Treasurer克里斯格拉夫kicked off the event with an introduction to the ways in which COPE is evolving to keep pace with the fast-moving world of publishing and publication ethics. He highlighted COPE's growing membership (>9000) and its rich web-based resources and improved ways of interacting with its membership (eg, through webinars and one-to-one telephone consultations).
Next up,orcid.欧盟的通讯经理乔什·棕色介绍了多方面的性质orcid.——倡议作者独特的标识符。Delegates will have been impressed to hear just how much more than a number the initiative is and how publishers and editors can use the concept to prevent several commonly encountered authorship problems.
Finally, attendees split into groups for guided discussion of three ethical issues taken from COPE’s archive of cases discussed at its quarterly Forums. Delegate interaction was enthusiastic and constructive, and many subject-specific and culture-specific insights were shared.
到目前为止的反馈是积极的,后悔仅仅延伸到了事件的简短性和天气的分解。COPE希望明年举办类似的活动。
克里斯格拉夫, COPE treasurer, opening the COPE Mini UK Seminar.
orcid.EU's Communications Manager, Josh Brown。
每个月我们都将突出显示出版的伦理案件,这些伦理案件已被我们的成员带到了应对论坛或要求应对会议。案件是由于多种原因强调 - 他们可能具有广泛的兴趣,引入了一个重要的新问题,即成员可能无法意识到,或者反映了应对越来越多地被问到的话题。我们欢迎对案件的意见和进一步讨论,并将在将来的问题中提供摘要。
原创作品在日志中发表。这篇文章有五位作者。五年后,第三作者要求更改他/她的名字。已发布的原始名称是SFHS,请求是将名称更改为SFH。姓氏是演员,现在他/她想要删除演员名称。
The COPE Forum was divided on whether or not the editor should allow the author to change their name. Read the discussion here://m.lang0752.com/case/change-author%E2%80%99s-name-after-publication