一个横断面,摄取相关研究was a final year student's project was submitted as an original article to our journal on 30 April 2011. On initial review it was obvious that it was conducted by students and written by them, but the list of authors had the supervisor as the first author, followed by 13 students.
作为相应作者的主管，在作者标准上受到质疑。如果是主管的项目，学生们帮助过，那么为什么有这么多学生列出（13人）？如果是学生项目，这是他们课程的要求，那么为什么主管第一作者？他/她应该只承认。
作者决定撤出他们想要将其发送到外国杂志的理由。我们获得了所有作者的签名并关闭了该文件。
同一篇论文于2011年8月29日重新提交了一篇新的篇章。它以前尚未发表的宣言于2011年9月5日发送给我们的杂志。作者姓名没有改变。学生的签名是先前提交的原始的复印件。显然主管认为，期刊办公室无法将本条与以前的提交联系起来。
The journal believes it would be useless to explain the authorship criteria to the supervisor as apparently he/she is eager to have another article on their CV. The students are the ones who suffer.
What steps should the journal take, particularly with regard to the false authorship?
论坛同意编辑的初始回复非常好，而S /他处理的情况很好，而且令人失望的是该消息没有通过作者。
论坛质疑编辑是否能够单独联系所有学生。该论坛再次强调，期刊应考虑在提交纸张时，在提交纸张时，还应考虑所有作者的电子邮件地址，而不仅仅是相应的作者。
Even if the editor feels it is pointless contacting the corresponding author following this second submission, the Forum argued that the editor should follow due process. The editor should contact the corresponding author and ask for an explanation. If the explanation is unsatisfactory, the editor should contact the author’s superior at the institution informing them that this person is not following the accepted guidelines on authorship. The editor could also contact someone at the institution (e.g. the Dean) and ask them if they have an institutional policy on authorship.
对于未来，编辑应考虑发布每篇论文中所有作者的贡献清单。
来自论坛的共识是，我应该申请所有学生作者的电子邮件地址和手机号码，并要求大学提出作者作者政策。我做了这两个。尽管提醒，大学没有回复。非正式，我被告知他们没有这样的政策。
我与其中一个学生说“关闭记录”告诉我，主管要求学生提供的这些联系方式。这些从未送到期刊。我让学生向他们所做的杂志发送给他们。所有学生和主管单独签署的以下陈述被邮寄给了日记。
“Contribution:
I as the undersigned author of the article titled xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, has contributed significantly in the various steps of the research starting from topic selection, literature review, introduction, methodology, questionnaire, analysis, discussion and final review. I am further submitting that there is no conflict among us on any matter regarding the order of authorship.”
The student also told me unofficially that they were coerced into signing this statement. The students who have done all of the work are the sufferers. They cannot raise any objections against the supervisor for fear of an impact on their career.
可以应对建议我现在应该怎么做？
编辑通知论坛现在已被撤回。论坛建议，虽然编辑必须接受这篇论文已被撤回，但她仍然应该追究机构的回应。主管行动不当，而且应该了解这一点。一个建议是发送挂号信（而不是电子邮件），以便编辑器确信已收到这封信。另一个建议是联系作者可能是成员的任何专业机构，告知他们不恰当的行为。
编辑还可以在作者政策上编辑，指的是医学期刊编辑（ICJME）指导方针的国际委员会。bob官方app对于未来，编辑可能会考虑更改日志向作者的指示，指出所有作者（不仅仅是相应作者）的名称和联系方式，都应向“提交论文”的期刊。编辑还可以考虑发布贡献者列表，详细介绍了对本文所作提交人的贡献。
FOLLOW UP (June 2012):
I first wrote to the corresponding author asking for the policy of the institution regarding authorship criteria. Simultaneously I wrote to the head of department of the research section and the Dean asking for the same. I received no reply. Recently the corresponding author, who is the supervisor and the first author, sent a letter stating that they wanted to withdraw both articles as they have decided to have the article published in a European journal. I have not replied to that request as I feel cornered.
来自同一个大学的另一位医学院的另外两个文章具有类似的性质。我遵循相同的程序，但再次没有回应。
Does the Forum think that I should write to the higher authorities, such as the Higher Education Commission and Medical Council, about the largest medical university in the country having no specific policy on authorship and the credit of the research being usurped by the faculty members, thus depriving the young students?
我正在收集所有这些案件，并将在下次出版伦理会议上发表演示。
有关进一步跟进的建议（2012年6月）：
The Forum agreed with the editor’s proposed course of action. In this case, the students are powerless and so it is left to the editor to pursue this case.