开放科学
美国科技政策办公室最近发布了有关题为“公众访问同行评审的学术出版物，数据和代码由联邦资助研究产生的学术出版物，数据和代码”的信息的通知。利益相关者对更广泛获取联邦资助研究的方法的评论是由于3月16日。
掠夺性出版
渥太华医院研究院新闻中心主任David Moher正在寻求利益相关者对旨在监测，衡量和停止掠夺性期刊的拟议活动的反馈。电子邮件[email protected]if you are interested in participating as soon as possible, and the research team will contact you in March to discuss next steps.
印度大学拨款委员会有新的准则要求大学培训研究和出版道德的博士学生。bob官方app指导方针bob官方app涉及对印度的掠夺性期刊和高水平的研究不当行为的担忧。
www.timeshighereducation.com/news/india-train-researchers-how-pot-pryatory-journals.
Preprints
The policies, features, and practices of 44 preprint platforms in the life and biomedical sciences were presented during a recent ASAPbio workshop on preprints. The workshop was attended by Iratxe Puebla, COPE’s Facilitation and Integrity Officer, and approximately 30 other stakeholders with the goal of developing an agreed set of best practices for metadata and processes to support the discoverability, use, and interoperability of preprints.
数据：https://zenodo.org/record/3612693#xk8q6ntkjct.
Workshop action points:https://trello.com/b/0q7pag8y/biopreprints2020
Research Integrity
日记Research Ethics, a COPE member, recently published an interesting article titled “Should research misconduct be criminalized?” As COPE moves forward with university members following a successful pilot program, the organisation may be well positioned to help address the authors’ conclusions that further clarity is needed in defining research misconduct, handling allegations, and determining sanctions.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898400
与此同时，欧洲研究大学联盟最近发表了一份题为“大学研究诚信文化的文件：从建议到实施。”他们提出了五项关键行动，可以支持大学的研究诚信，包括教育研究人员，包括所有职业水平，并提供了他们成员的最佳实践的例子。
www.leru.org/publications/towards-a-research-integrity-亵渎 -
此外，出版商最近采访了迈克尔Dougherty教授，他在Cope的2019年北美研讨会上发表了关于出版道德的讲话。呼应在研讨会上发表评论，他重申了艺术，人文和社会科学奖学金的一些独特的研究诚信问题，以及适应COPE流程图的必要性 - 在应对的过程中已经进入的东西。
https://blog.brill.com/humanitiesmatter/publication_ethics_michael_dougherty.html
Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests
国际医学期刊编辑委员会（ICMJE）最近提出了披露表格的变更。关于建议更改的反馈是由于4月30日，提交的评论被公开发布。
https://forms.acponline.org/weborm/comments-proposed-icmje-disclosure-form.
Data and Reproducibility
开放科学中心很快将推出新的排名系统，以衡量期刊对研究透明度的承诺，并打算在今年晚些时候提供约1000个期刊的分数。
www.timeshighereducation.com/news/journal-transparency-index-will-be-alternative-impart-cometes.
同行评审过程
多个期刊最近发现可疑的patterns of self-citation requests by a biophysicist/bioinformatician either acting as a peer reviewer or handling manuscripts as an Editorial Board member. The individual, who was previously named as a highly cited researcher by Clarivate Analytics, is accused of systematically manipulating the peer review process to boost his own citations – allegations he denies.
www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00335-7.
发布后讨论和更正
日记Learned Publishing，一个守则成员，最近发表了一个标题为“撤回通知的局限性的回顾性文章和纠正学术纪录的作者的英雄行为：分析1975年至2019年的论文撤回。”作者指出，收回通知需要更具信息丰富，并应对Retraction Guidelines明确说明这样的通知应指定谁发起了缩回以及为什么文章不可靠。此外，他还建议赞扬作者，他启动自己的工作撤退，以及为所有公布的文章添加一个描述的研究限制。
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/leap.1282
在我们3月份的消化Deborah Poff，Cope主席，与任何新出版物伦理问题的人有关的指导和案件，或者需要进修。在我们最近的论坛之后，我们很乐意听到您在我们调查中编辑同行评审的意见。调查结果以及我们网站上的论坛讨论和评论，将通知某项问题讨论文件，就汇集共享意见。
The case discussion is around the case 'Withdrawal of paper at proof stage'. An original paper was submitted to a journal, peer reviewed, revised by the authors, and accepted by the manuscript editor. It was scheduled for publication 3 months later. After the paper was copyedited and typeset, the corresponding author was informed of the acceptance and was asked to proofread the article. After 2 weeks, however, the corresponding author requested that the paper be withdrawn. The chief editor asked for an explanation and brought the case to COPE Forum.