你在这里

In the News: July Digest

Intellectual property

预印刷是最快的含量类型之一,过去两年左右的30%左右,而在同一时期的2-3%的成长相比。
https://www.crossref.org/blog/preprints-growth-rate-ten-times-higher-than-journal-articles/
为非洲科学家提供了一个新的免费预印刷服务,由OSF预印刷提供支持
https://osf.io/preprints/africarxiv.

不当行为的指控

中国对裂纹陶氏引入了全面改革n on academic misconduct. These include a national database which could disqualify researchers from future funding, a blacklist of ‘poor quality’ journals and a government agency that is responsible for policing misconduct.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05359-8
这篇文章在监护人方面认为,科学竞争水平,而不是推动创新,对研究造成浪费和损害。
https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2018/jun/15/is-competition-driving-innovation-or-damaging-scientific-research

七位研究人员已被发现对Karolinska Insite的科学不当行为,另有31名因其贡献而受到称赞,与Paolo Macchiarini撰写的六篇文章有关。
https://ki.se/en/news/seven-researchers-responsible-for-cenientific-miscondent-in-macchiarini -case.

作者和挑养

本预称的作者认为,需要仲裁来解决科学作者纠纷
https://peerj.com/preprints/26987/

数据和再现性

Lisa Federer报告了一个分析,表明开放数据的理想远远不完全实现,研究人员利用储存库的使用清楚地区的改进区域。
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/06/14/journal-data-sharing-policies-are-moving-the-scientific-community-towards-greater-openness-but -cerly-more-工作遗体/

本博客介绍了一种以数据为中心的科学研究方法和它提出的问题的突出。
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2015/10/05/politics-of-data-scientific-data-centrism/

关于数据收集和使用的更多道德问题 - 谁做出决定?http://theconversation.com/data-ethics-is-more-than-just-what-we-do-with-data-its-also-about-whos-doing-it-98010

The authors of this preprint suggest creating an “R-factor” calculated by dividing the number of published reports that have verified a scientific claim by the number of attempts to do so
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/1017/08/09/172940 .full.pdf.

亚洲bob平台

本手册描述了基本概念,包括道德分析,风险/效益评估,机密性和知情同意过程,以及研究伦理委员会,培训计划组织和财务冲突问题的作用。
http://www.who.int/ethics/publications/9789241598002/cn/

Funders Jean Lebel and Robert McLean describe a new tool for judging the value and validity of science that attempts to improve lives.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05581-4
可见的研究人员在英语以外的语言中的影响:开发专业指数
目前的冲击测量系统偏向于区域聚焦的研究,从事与当地社会问题有关。这是研究人员在语言中使用英语以外的语言的研究人员的一个特殊问题。Peter Dahler-Larsen开发了一款新指标,这是一个新的指标,希望捕获研究人员能够将其影响扩散到英语区域之外的能力的变化。
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/06/13/making-visible-the -impact-of-researchers-working-in-languages-ther-than-english-developing-the-plote-指数/

作者测试了学术期刊辩论的伦理限制。
https://theconversation-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/theconversation.com/amp/genocide-hoax-tests- ethics-of-academic-publishing-98436

杂志管理

皇家生物学学会的一个有用摘要,重点是图像操纵问题以及观察的问题。
https://thebiologist.rsb.org.uk/biologist-features/158-biologist/features/1972-focus-on-image-manipulation-2

我们如何帮助新的期刊,尤其是在LMIC中,他们是该领域的新的,并试图改进和建立自己,而不是将它们归类为掠夺性和注定失败?
https://awayofhappening.wordpress.com/2018/06/09/the-instutqualized-racism-of-scholarly-publishing/

Indonesia’s new initiative pushing scholars to publish more articles, means that the country does not have enough journals to publish the 150,000 papers per year.
http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2018/06/10/wanted-6000-new-journals-to-publish-150000-papers.html.

Peer review process

eLife is conducting a trial in which authors will decide how to respond to the issues raised during peer review.
https://elifesciences.org/articles/36545

发布发布讨论和更正

Two case studies of actions taken when mistakes are discovered and there is a need to set the record straight
https://www.apnews.com/amp/006c63cb60e941a7b6784e7bcefcf0b1

应付Council members南希c chescheir.anddeborah Kahn.

Read COPE Digest newsletter for more advice and resources to support your intellectual property policies and procedures, the case of the month 'Suspected unattributed text in a published article', a quick poll for you to take following up on our webinar 'Creating and implementing research data policies', COPE Council vacancy announcement plus our usual roundup of news and events.

阅读2018年7月消化:知识产权|透明度