掠夺性出版
来自十个国家的主要学者和出版商同意了掠夺性出版的定义。需要12个小时的讨论，18个问题和3轮达到。
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03759-y
Allegations of misconduct
中国教育部以及一些期刊正在调查免疫医生和大学主席曹旭涛的大量论文，尤利斯·巴克提出的担忧，他们包含有问题的图像。
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03599 -w
Cope议会会员博士博士博士，在“一年中”（今年人民）中得到了认可：2019年的高等教育至关重要，为她与Cath Ellis博士在大学欺骗作弊作弊的工作中。布雷格博士表示，大学可能检测到秘籍中的第六名，并认为需要以有意义的方式解决问题的机构文化变革。
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/people-year-who-mattered-higher-education-in2019
数据和再现性
The STM Association has designated 2020 as the “STM Research Data Year” with the goals of increasing the number of journals with data policies and that deposit the data links to the SCHOLIX framework, increasing the number of articles with data availability statements and the citations to datasets.
https://www.stm-assoc.org/standards-technology/2020-stm-research-data-year//
The UK Reproducibility Network, which formed during 2019, now has ten university members who are commited to working together to determine how their cultural practices, such as emphasizing the importance of novelty, discovery and priority, undermine the value of replication, verification and transparency.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03750-7
This presentation at the Munin Conference in December, described an initiative to increase awareness within the linguistics community of the value of data citation.
https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/SCS/article/view/4876(include image)
The authors of this paper present a consensus-based checklist to improve and document the transparency of research reports in social and behavioural research.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-019-0772-6
亚洲bob平台
ICMJE建议已修订。主要变化是重建COIS对关系和活动，为包含和多样性提供努力，并建议引用掠夺性期刊。
http://www.icmje.org/news-editorials/icmje-recommendations_annotated_dec19.pdf.
The number of retractions for papers published by Chinese researchers is disproportionately high. This paper reports on the challenges in research integrity, and potential strategies and solutions to address it, based on research carried out through studying global retraction data, data on revoked national grants and and surveys and interviews with researchers and major stakeholders in China.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03613-1
弗里斯Uta,过去英国科学一个总统ssociation, calls for a “slow science revolution” suggesting that it would be worth restricting the number of publications that a researcher could publish each year, to reduce the information overload which is caused by the current pressure to publish.
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/restrict-researchers-one-paper-ayear-says-ucl-professor
On 27 January, LIBER in collaboration with FIT4RR will hold a webinar on research integrity and responsible research covering trends, training approaches and implementing responsible research practices.
https://twitter.com/libereurope/status/1210470464889524224
研究进入高等教育会议社会的研究，该会议基于75名人文和社会科学，高级管理人员和中国期刊编辑的访谈，建议并非所有的学者都热衷于中文中的“现金”激励计划大学。
https：//www.timeshighereducation.com/news/chinese-scholars-show-mixed-responses-cash-articles.
杂志管理
随着中国宣布5年多百万美元的计划开发其STM期刊出版，学术厨房采访了两名中国出版商对此努力的看法。
Peer review processes
学术评论比我们想象的要大得多。本文介绍了古罗马古代罗马的编辑审查的例子，涉及第四世纪的出版物同行评审，并在第十六个世纪的出版前审查。
https://utpjournals.press/doi/full/10.3138/jsp.51.1.04
本文提出了对计算机科学的单一盲目与双盲评论的研究，结论是单盲评论对来自高声望机构的着名作者和作者的论文赋予了重要优势。
https://www.pnas.org/content/114/48/12708
对茎田调查调查了对在同行审查期间接受不专业意见的长期影响的普遍存在和作者的看法。他们发现，传统上持有的群体最有可能在收到一个不专业的同行评审后感知负面影响，并且这些可能会使这些群体的差距在干野中延长。
https://peerj.com/articles/8247/
Post-publication discussions
在这个学术职位帖子中，作者讨论了一个已经开发的工具，该工具被制定，以评估作者是否已向群体，权力分析以及关键资源解决了对象的致盲，性和随机化。
其他新闻
An analysis of 49k manuscript submissions and 76k peer reviews showed that levels of out of hours work by researchers were high with clear differences seen between countries. Chinese researchers most often worked at weekends and at midnight, whereas researchers in Scandinavian countries were among the most likely to submit during the week and the middle of the day. The authors suggest some policy interventions which could be made in universities and by journals to reduce the expectation that this work is done outside working hours.
https://www.bmj.com/content/367/bmj.l6460
系统性评测和荟萃分析广泛用于通知临床指南和决策。bob官方app强大的组织已经出现在系统审查结果下构建医学知识库。但是，如果系统评价实际上，何种弊大于好？
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)32766-7/fulltext
应对理事会成员deborah Kahn.
在应对1月份的1月消化中，我们在1月份信中推出了COPE椅子，德国·普夫（Deborah Poff）引入的掠夺性出版讨论文件。我们从Helena王于中国的研究诚信挑战。2020年即将到来的活动包括墨尔本的三月COPE研讨会，与ISTME一起举行，以及我们的3月论坛，了解成员提交的新案件和主题讨论，编辑审稿人评论。